Thursday, March 27, 2008
Hillary longa, Obama brevis
If Obama is the nominee, I hope my fellow Democrats will not forget Obama's moves to block revotes in Michigan and Florida, his personal attacks on Hillary, his lies about her record, his distortions of the Clinton years, his arrogance, etc.
This is the sort of man we're supposed to "unify" behind?
Thank you, no.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
With sponsors like these...
More news on the GLAAD front. Apparently, GLAAD suckered Comcast into sponsoring it's "Be an ally & a friend" parade of B-list celebrities, um, I mean campaign. Comcast is currently a contender for Consumerist's "Worst Company in America" title. Not that I believe GLAAD has any scruples about their donors, but still, Comcast?
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
All that is old is new again
GLAAD announced today that they've hired someone to work in the San Francisco Bay Area. This is what their press release said:
For those of you who do not understand GLAAD-speak, let me translate: "People in San Francisco won't give us money because we don't have an office there (yes, we closed our office there years ago). We've tried to make it seem like we care about San Francisco by holding a lame awards ceremony there, but it hasn't worked out so well. Therefore, we're sending Mr. Barajas to see how much money he can bilk out of the San Francisco gays."
Does anyone want to place bets on how long he stays?
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) announced today the hiring of Juan Barajas as a Senior Director to be based in the San Francisco/Bay Area. In this new role, Barajas will report directly to GLAAD President Neil G. Giuliano and will be responsible for strengthening GLAAD’s media advocacy and anti–defamation work in the region in its many forms and collaborating with other lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) and allied organizations.
For those of you who do not understand GLAAD-speak, let me translate: "People in San Francisco won't give us money because we don't have an office there (yes, we closed our office there years ago). We've tried to make it seem like we care about San Francisco by holding a lame awards ceremony there, but it hasn't worked out so well. Therefore, we're sending Mr. Barajas to see how much money he can bilk out of the San Francisco gays."
Does anyone want to place bets on how long he stays?
The war five years later
There was a big anti-war protest in San Francisco today to mark the five year anniversary of the start of the Iraq war. Aside from snarling traffic and annoying people who were trying to go about their everyday business, I fail to see what the protest, especially here in SF, accomplished. I suppose if spending several hours yelling anti-war slogans at people who mostly agree with you is your idea of a worthy endeavor, then today was a resounding success.
In any case, I've never quite understood the progressive movement's position on the Iraq war. The anti-war movement's entire message seems to be simply "war is bad." Undoubtedly, war is horrible, but just ask Neville Chamberlain how well the "war is bad" mindset works out. Before the Iraq war started, I read Kanan Makiya's Republic of Fear, a book that details the crimes of Saddam Hussein's regime. Political executions, gassing of the Kurds, rapes, torture... as the book's title indicates, Iraq before the war was not a happy place to be. So, a question I would love to see an anti-war activist address is this: Is it always wrong to use force to destroy an evil regime or group (regardless of Bush's true motives in the Iraq war)? Is it better to let the Taliban execute women in soccer stadiums? Is it better to allow Hutus to massacre Tutsis (UN troops were only allowed to defend themselves in Rawanda. They couldn't attack Hutus to save defenseless Tutsis)? Is it better to let the janjaweed kill the inhabitants of Darfur?
I also want to give every anti-war activist a copy of Orwell's The Road to Wigan Pier to help them understand that their goofy hats and pink outfits are actually undermining their cause.
And finally, Makiya--still a good source on the Iraq war--talks about what he got wrong five years ago.
In any case, I've never quite understood the progressive movement's position on the Iraq war. The anti-war movement's entire message seems to be simply "war is bad." Undoubtedly, war is horrible, but just ask Neville Chamberlain how well the "war is bad" mindset works out. Before the Iraq war started, I read Kanan Makiya's Republic of Fear, a book that details the crimes of Saddam Hussein's regime. Political executions, gassing of the Kurds, rapes, torture... as the book's title indicates, Iraq before the war was not a happy place to be. So, a question I would love to see an anti-war activist address is this: Is it always wrong to use force to destroy an evil regime or group (regardless of Bush's true motives in the Iraq war)? Is it better to let the Taliban execute women in soccer stadiums? Is it better to allow Hutus to massacre Tutsis (UN troops were only allowed to defend themselves in Rawanda. They couldn't attack Hutus to save defenseless Tutsis)? Is it better to let the janjaweed kill the inhabitants of Darfur?
I also want to give every anti-war activist a copy of Orwell's The Road to Wigan Pier to help them understand that their goofy hats and pink outfits are actually undermining their cause.
And finally, Makiya--still a good source on the Iraq war--talks about what he got wrong five years ago.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Pin a merit badge on Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Finally, some words of truth and wisdom from Earl Ofari Hutchinson on this whole Geraldine Ferraro hubbub. Ms. Ferraro needs to keep her chin up. The fact that there has been such a furor over her comment that Obama wouldn't be where he is today if not for his race I think proves that there is much truth in what she said. The Obamatards doth protest too much.
And, oh yeah, Keith Olbermann is a dick.
And, oh yeah, Keith Olbermann is a dick.
Monday, March 10, 2008
As if we needed more proof that the Internets are crawling with Obamatons
It seems Talking Points Memo has fired a female blogger for writing posts that don't support the editors' idea that Barack Obama is the the One and Right True Supreme Leader. Remember, Obamatons: Resistance is futile.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Monday, March 3, 2008
Tonight, we nom in hell!
Depending on what the fates have in store for tomorrow I may not get around to posting anything, so I just wanted to congratulate Senator Clinton in advance for hanging tough through this long, difficult period and for not heeding the calls of the Obamatards, in the media and elsewhere, to drop out. This whole thing reminds me very much of war, with Hillary and her loyal supporters fending off wave after wave of Obamatards hell bent on destroying the democratic party. I say to Hillary and all of her supporters: Fight on!
Hello there, Senator
Ignore the stupid misogynistic quote, but I think Hillary looks darn good in this photo. It tickles my appreciation for anachronistic cross-dressing.
She still can't hold a candle to Discipulus Legis, however.
GO HILLARY!
She still can't hold a candle to Discipulus Legis, however.
GO HILLARY!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)